Saturday 25 August 2012

Watford away: a game in prospect

I'm about to head off to Watford for the Blues game which, although early in the season, will be another important one in terms of Clark finding his best team that he can then use for the more nitty-gritty games around mid-September sort of time.
 
I say this because, judging by our performance against Charlton last week and the result at Sheffield Wednesday in midweek, we are still in pre-season mode. Given everything that has happened this summer with Hughton leaving and a minor overhaul of the squad, not to mention all of the uncertainty in the boardroom, it has inevitably taken time for the players to gel and for the dust to settle- I still don't think that process is over.
 
I also think Watford are in a similar position to ourselves in some ways. They've had some new Italian owners coming in this summer who have brought in Gianfranco Zola as their new manager, plus a few new Italiany players coming in on loan. There's an Italian theme coming through at that club.
 
Whenever anyone mentions Zola to me I can't help but remember Chelsea's pre-Ambromovich period when they had Gudjohnsen and Hasselbaink about 10 years ago. I remember Blues playing Chelsea at Stamford Bridge and Zola absolutely walked over us. I think for Watford though, the new players will take time to bed in and the fact that Watford won their first game and then lost their second suggests that it's to early in the season to make much of a judgement on them.
 
With both teams still in that transitional period, I can only really see a draw for this game. I won't be very popular in the pub beforehand for saying this, but it has 0-0 written all over it. If I'm honest, the main reason I'm going to the game is to meet up with my brother who's just come back from Thailand this week.
For a few of the other games briefly, I think Blackburn against Leicester will be the key match in the Championship. If Blackburn win, their fans may begin to have faith in their manager Steve Kean- which would be interesting to see. I think the way he's perservered with the job given so much hate  and stick from his own fans, it shows a kind of bravery that borderlines on stupidity. So many people would have walked away- I can't help but admire him for that. For Leicester, they need to bounce back from losing at Charlton on Tuesday to ensure they're not playing catch-up football in September.
In the Premiership, I think it was a big statement of intent for United to spend £20 million on van Persie, I've got a feeling he will score against Fulham. You've also got to fancy Man City for the win at Liverpool on Sunday, to begin to pile the pressure on Brendan Rodgers- he's made the same mistake as Dalglish by spending too much money on average players.

Monday 20 August 2012

Blues 1-1 Addicks: new-season fever

In the days coming up to this match, I hoped the game would provide me with a bit more of a base for evaluations on how well we could expect to do this season. Whilst we controlled the midfield quite well at times, I felt we looked vulnerable defensively and lacked that bit of guile and ruthlessness in the final third. In the end, a point was probably about a fair result, but we could still consider ourselves a little fortunate to get it with Nikola Zigic's late goal. If I'm honest, I feel none the wiser.

Waking up this morning, I felt a little more confident about this season for Blues than I did just after the Antwerp game a week ago. We had knocked a few goals past Barnet in the Carling Cup on Tuesday, the sun was shining and I felt that sense of buzzing anticipation for the first game always typical of the new season.

I had had a bit of a boozey brunch by the time I got to the game. I went to meet up at one of my dad's friends for his traditional pre-season buffet, met up in Moseley for a drink with some of my West Brom-supporting cousins who were playing Liverpool and got to the ground 20 minutes early to the sound of chattering Blues fans from the tilton eagerly anticipating this one.

In the opening exchanges, I noticed that Lee Clark had implemented a progressive, control system in the middle of the park. Our two central midfielders, Ravel Morrison and Hayden Mullins prowled the halfway line, playing a sort of patient, probing, short passing game at a relatively low tempo.

The benefits of this were that it gave the more creative players, such as Peter Lovenkrands, Darren Ambrose and Chris Burke, the freedom to get forward, express themselves and support target man marlon king up front. It also meant that we had a fair bit of possession.

The problems with it were that the aforementioned players, maybe Chris Burke aside, lacked that bit of quality going forward- their movement off the ball seemed to be very prioritised on  just finding space even when the player with the ball couldn't pick them out with a pass, so they weren't as able to get on the ball and really influence play.
This problem, combined with how well Chris Powell had organised his Charlton side, meant that on many occassions we would play a series of short passes, realise that it wasn't going to lead to a shot on goal, try to play a more clinical pass to someone further away, and then just lose possession.
I thought that then made us incredibly vulnerable to the pace of Bradley Wright-Phillips and Yann Kermorgant on a few of Charlton's counter attacks, as our players tended to lose their focus and positional discipline when we had the ball- we were often caught out of position. Steven Caldwell was forced to make a few last-ditch tackles to stop Wright-Phillips having a one-on-one chance, Jack Butland had to make some decent saves to keep us in it and I remember Charlton having at least three free headers on goal from around the penalty spot.

We were lucky to be going in at half-time at 0-0. Although we had had the better of the play in terms of possession, it was Charlton who had easily had the better of the chances and could have been a couple of goals ahead.

In the second half, I noticed a slight improvement. We had nudged our tempo up a little bit, we were playing with a little bit more urgency, but I didn't feel that it was our slow tempo that stopped us from creating chances in the first half. The main problem was that Marlon King was being marked out of the game by Charlton's defence and that the players given the free role to support him and make runs off him, weren't doing so in as well-timed and smart a way as they had been known to. As the game got deeper into the second half, there were more and more high balls from midfield in towards King, but with two centre-backs on him, he was forced to resort to just getting a shot away with his back to goal.

Defensively, we didn't learn from our mistakes and on a Charlton counterattack typical of what happened in the first half, Bradley Pritchard crossed the ball in from the right-hand side and Leon Cort scored with another free header at the back post to give Charlton the lead ten minutes from time.
Lee Clark then put on Zigic for the last five minutes and he made an instant impact. He held the ball up well and got a lot more of the flick-ons than King did which opened things up a bit, he scored a pretty good goal in the last minute to rescue a point- he received the ball near the edge of the 'D', flicked it past a defender and sidefooted it in the bottom-left corner to ignite our campaign and give us a point out of practically nothing.

It still remains to be seen whether we can gather some of that momentum and confidence that Chris Hughton instilled in the team last season, and whilst I like to be one of the more optimistic Birmingham City fans, Lee Clark hasn't quite provided that yet. But having said that, its difficult to be too critical of him too early. We've only played one league game under the new regime and things will undoubtably take time to settle. Though its not exactly a confidence-inspiring start from him from what I've seen, we have to wait until at least October to make much of a judgement.

Sunday 12 August 2012

Blues 1-3 Antwerp: cause for Royal concern?

So this game approached me as a bit of an unknown quantity for a couple of reasons. For one thing, it would be the first time I'd see this new look Blues team under Lee Clark and what his philosophy is (I mean in football, not whether free will or determinism exists). I'd not heard much of Clark before, though I seem to remember he played for Fulham about eight years ago and was sacked as manager of Huddersfield last season. With the much-loved Chris Hughton left for Norwich then, you could have forgiven the most optimistic of bluenoses for being rather sceptical about the choice of his replacement. I hoped this game would provide me with at least some degree of reassurance.

The other thing that intrigued me about this game, was that I knew nothing about Antwerp- and how good, or bad, they are in the scheme of Belgian football. Having said that, I vaguely recalled them to be an affiliate club of Man United from my dabbling in the football manager games.
In terms of Belgium generally, what interests me is that they are one of those multi-lingual countries. I knew from my European tour when we played Club Brugge, that they speak a combination of German, Dutch and French. I sometimes wonder if people there know what each other are saying in conversations.
To be fair to them, they were excellent fans. They were on their feet for the whole game, and quite a lot of their songs were English. They sung 'Hey Jude', a couple of trademark Manchester United songs, after which they strangely sung 'you'll never walk alone', which surprised me. I half expected them to burst into blue moon. The other funny thing was that once their third goal went in they started chanting: "shame on you, shame on you" I thought, what a middle-class way of insulting a team. What next? "you're not very good, and you know you aren't."

Anyway, this time me and dad sat in different seats. I was getting too heavy for him. This time we sat in the tilton behind the goal. When the teams came out, I made a point of standing up to applaud Jack Butland into goal, which I think he acknowledged due to the lack of people at the game. He had done fantastically well to get into the Team GB side at the Olympics from being on loan at Cheltenham for most of last season! If truth be told, it was also partly because I was concious of how well he would do. I think when any young goalkeeper comes into a team, there can be a tendency for them to be nervous, flap at balls into the box, feel overrawed by the defence- but there was something different about Butland. He shouted instructions from time to time, when he was told to collect the ball he would, he came for crosses. I felt comfortable enough with him in goal.

What worried me the most, was Lee Clark's team selection. Up front, we had a system involving Zigic as the central target man, Wade Elliott playing slightly deeper with Lovenkrands as part left winger/part forward, and Adam Rooney- who is traditionally a striker- on the right wing. I would have otherwise been positively interested in the effects of this system and the reasons behind it had it not been for the selection of players in midfield. We'd signed Ravel Morrison on loan from West Ham a few days previously, I knew him to be an attacking midfielder, but he was played in the centre alongside Morgaro Gomis, another more creative-minded player. To play that an attacking a team was a mistake on Lee Clark's part. We had no structure in the centre of the park and were left very vulnerable to the Antwerp midfield- we gave it away an awful lot. I think a better choice would have been to play Darren Ambrose and Hayden Mullins. Mullins, certainly, would have at least given us that protection for the back four in the 'water carrier' role. I also wondered why Chris Burke wasn't in the side ahead of Rooney on the right but was prepared to put it down to fitness reasons for the time being. In terms of the defence, he played Steven Caldwell and Pablo Ibanez. Curtis Davies was virtually an ever-present in Chris Hughton's team last season and had done very well- a strong contender for player of the season in my opinion. Instead of him, Clark played Steven Caldwell who can't run and Pablo Ibanez who gets scared of high balls that come towards him. The perfect combination, then, against a pacy striker and a tall target man. This didn't improve my confidence for the rest of the game.

We started the match looking very relaxed on the ball- almost to the point where we were too relaxed and lacked that bit of energy, that urgency and hunger to prove ourselves. Wegave the ball away in midfield a fair bit and with such an attack-focused line-up, I didn't feel like there were enough people behind the ball to win it back. Some of our long passes were sloppy and some of our players dwelled on the ball for far longer than they should have. It was like we played with a swagger that we didn't have the right for. I don't know how else to quite describe it.
Perhaps a partial reason for our sluggish start was that the distribution of the fans was very spread out. Chants that broke out were few and far between and it was more a case of individual spectatorship than support. I was pleased then, when Ravel Morrison scored on his non-competitive debut at the Railway End and that nudged the atmosphere up a bar.
What pissed me off then, was that we conceded almost immediately afterwards. When any team takes a lead, the thinking has to be "right, let's keep it tight, let's not give anything away". But when Antwerp kicked off, there was no body language of the sort, and we looked vulnerable down our left-hand side with academy graduate Mitch Hancox getting a start. The cross came in far too easily and Butland parried it onto the goalline for their centre-forward to get a cheap goal.

Now, all the momentum and energy was with the Belgian side. They completely outplayed our midfield and my suspicions about Morrison's attack-mindedness were proved accurate- he never tracked back to help the defence and Gomis was getting passed around the place in midfield. With the space between defence and midfield left completely open, Ibanez had to close down from defence, which left gaps at the back and he made a clumsy tackle from behind in the box on Antwerp's pacy forward. The penalty was converted despite Butland's best efforts putting us behind at half-time.

To try and cheer myself up, I decided to get myself a Coke from the refreshments bar. Annoyingly though, the one time I remembered to go before the interval to beat the queue, I found the bar closed. With a rare poor score from me at the half-time quiz in the programme, my mood was not improved when I found Clark had made no substitutions at half-time, when it was blindingly obvious how much we needed to change the midfield.

Quite early on in the second half, we gave another goal away. Again, we were pushed wide open at the back and Will Packwood, another academy graduate with Fellaini-esc hair, gave it away. He had done quite well up to this point, since he came on early for Stephen Carr who had a fitness issue. Another penalty, another goal for Antwerp. When that went in, I felt like unless we did something about the defence, they could walk through us and score five or six.

To be fair though, we did end the game on a minor high as towards the end Hayden Mullins and Curtis Davies came on which made us more solid at the back. Also, Nathan Redmond looked bright, Adam Rooney only narrowly missed a one-on-one chance and Nikola Zigic scored a goal that was ruled out for offside. It took the gloss off their win a bit and gave us some fresh hope for the season to walk out on.

Overall though, Clark was talking in his programme notes about this game being an attempt to get everyone's fitness up for the new season. I disagreed with him. I think the first few games of pre-season should be devoted to fitness and, this being our last friendly match of the summer, it should have been more about getting the tactical system mapped out for the players and a final run through. I would think we must be quite a bit behind the level of fitness other teams have at this time and the prospect of getting a point next week against a Charlton team with the momentum of last season's promotion from the division below is becoming almost an inviting one.

Thursday 2 August 2012

Why Arsenal should sell Robin van Persie

Hi all-

A lot of blogs I've read about Arsenal and the topic of Robin van Persie have been saying that Robin van Persie is crucial to the future of Arsenal, and that the only way to persuade him to stay is to go on a £100 million summer spending spree.

Obviously he has now rejected the possibility of signing a new contract in favour of a move to Manchester City or Manchester United. For me, van Persie leaving Arsenal for about £20 million would not be a disaster. He is now 29, edging away from his best years, i think in the next few years he may begin to lose his fitness, his agility and the way he comes alive in the box, the skills he has based his career on. I think £20 million is quite a lot of money for Arsenal to get for him, when you consider that he may begin to age, he is on high wages, not to mention that he has said he wants to leave the club.

Whilst I think Man City would be being the most sensible in parting with that kind of money for him, I would lose quite a bit of respect for van Persie if he signed for them. Mainly because it would be obvious he was signing for them for the money. He couldn't be guarenteed first team football at the Citizens, with Aguero, Tevez, Dzeko and Balotelli in the squad.

However, if he signed for Manchester United, it would be clear he was signing up for a challenge, and the buzz of pressure that comes with signing for a club with that kind of tradition and a manager like Sir Alex Ferguson. Whilst the likes of Welbeck and Hernandez might get the odd starting spot ahead of him in Cup matches, he would be playing week in, week out and would potentially be the saviour of United given the challenges they face this season, or buckle under the pressure to be so.

At this point I would admit to having a bit of a soft spot for Manchester United. Aside from having a few friends who support them, I like the way they have built great sides over the course of history, not by having a mega-rich chairman who can pump billions into the club at will, but by having a fantastic youth setup and building great teams over time. I also think that the partnership of Rooney and van Persie would be interesting to see, and would give United a chance to make this title race at least a bit interesting.

Gabriel